The Canon 5D Mk 4
Looking at the Canon 5D Mk 4 for Wildlife & Bird Flight Photography.
Part 1 – First Thoughts.
The other day Calumet asked if I wanted to test the new Canon 5D Mk 4. I’d just done an autofocus workshop in Birmingham and had been asked about this camera, so I thought it would be a good idea to take up the offer.
I’ve deliberately stayed well clear of any reviews of this camera while waiting for its delivery – don’t want to unbox it with any preconceived ideas do we??!!
I picked the camera up yesterday from Calumet Manchester, replete with the stunning 500mm f4 LIS Mk 2 lens – “Leanne, where’s the other two spare batteries you promised you’d ordered for me?”
The only Canon DSLRs I’ve used over the past couple of years are the 1DX marks 1 & 2, with the occasional ‘smattering’ of 5DMk3 when I’ve been out with clients – so this new offering from Canon has something of a ‘clean slate’ to start with in my eyes.
So it’s a bit of a shame it got off to a bad start when I pulled it out of its case last night and found that Canon STILL haven’t added a viewfinder blind – a major fault with the 5DMk3 in my opinion.
What the heck are they thinking?
This camera is no 1DX Mk 2, and it’ll be bought by folk who want to shoot landscapes, seascapes, wide-field astro, a bit of studio work perhaps – it won’t be bought by folk like me who shoot big hairy-arsed beasties in zero light at ISO-stupid; yet the 1DX has one!
Come on Canon – think about the little things chaps.
Anyway, here’s the rig Calumet have supplied to me, just to see how far we can penetrate the domain of the 1DX Mk2/Nikon D5…
All those stupid straps can bugger off for starters – Jesus, they are a recipe for disaster. But WAIT – if I take the camera strap off I’ve not got my stupid rubber flappy thingy viewfinder blind….
Now imagine I’m using this Canon 5D Mk 4 camera with a wide-angle lens shooting a low light seascape with a 10 stop ND and a 2 minute exposure. That strap flapping in the wind and rattling on the tripod legs isn’t going to do much for image sharpness is it…it’s pathetic.
As a Nikon shooter the lack of a proper blind irks the heck out of me, but we’ll put it aside as I’m sure older 5D users are well used to the problem by now.
So moving on…
My two main interests in the Canon 5D Mk 4 are autofocus performance first, and ISO/low light performance a close second – being good at both is a prerequisite for wildlife photography, and in my mind this 5D Mk 4 is pitching its tent on the lawn belonging to the Nikon D810, so there’s a benchmark for it!
Setting the Canon 5D Mk 4 to my normal ‘Canon settings’ I nearly came a cropper before I started!
Not being used to the, shall we say ‘cheaper’ Canon DSLRs I pressed the DRIVE AF Mode button and flicked the front dial one click, assuming that this would shift the camera from the ONE SHOT mode the previous user had left it, to AI SERVO:
But NO…..WTF is this:
AI FOCUS…..what’s that all about then? So I did something that pained me greatly – picked up the manual – and wished I hadn’t.
So we hit the internet, and the the first hit in a Google search was:
That sounded so interestingly unreasonable that I tried it – and soon stopped!
Nahh… it’s not for me – unless I’m missing something major!
So just make sure you are in AI SERVO if you or your subject, or both, are moving.
It’s cloudy outside and about 1.5 hours before sunset, but let’s step outside and do my basic ‘car number plate’ AF test in CASE 1, just to see ‘the lay of the land’ with this Canon 5D Mk 4:
If you want to download the full resolution jpegs – 700Mb zip file – please click here. The file is at my Dropbox, so if this post goes a bit viral then it may take a while to download.
So there are 30 images, no processing done to them at all, and they are all either 5000 or 6500 ISO.
Shot hand held, 1/2000th, f6.3, manual exposure with auto ISO and back-button-only focus. Maximum frame rate was not quite 7fps (well it didn’t sound like it anyway), and I tried to shoot bursts of around 5 or 6 frames. It was only on the last of these that I was concious of shooting in buffer overflow.
Single Point AF was being used, in Case 1 – which isn’t best suited to this particular job. But it’s my standard test with any Canon, just to see how far off the ball the camera/lens combo is.
Shutter release priority was set to FOCUS for the first frame, and +1 focus priority for the second and subsequent frames.
And I have to say I’m pretty impressed. It’s done a heck of a sight better than I was expecting in Case 1.
Yes the shots have some noise and it certainly can’t hold a candle to its big brother 1DX Mk2 in that department, but then again its not been designed that way. Neither do I regard the noise as much of a problem either because it’s evenly distributed and not overly present in shadows.
But from an autofocus point of view the biggest percentage of those shots are on the money so to speak, and where it has gone wrong it’s only by a whisker; always slightly behind the target – that’s to be expected with an accelerating subject and Case 1 Accel/decel tracking of ‘0’, using a long telephoto.
A considerable improvement over the 5D Mk 3 in both noise and AF performance in my opinion, neither do I think the Mk 3 would have managed 30 frames in the same amount of time.
Over the next couple of weeks I’ll be posting more of my thoughts and findings about the Canon 5D Mk 4. Tomorrow I’ll do some ISO testing and a bit more on the autofocus if the weather and time permit, so expect another post shortly!
And yes, it’s official, Andy HATES the bloody touch-screen! Boy am I going to get myself in trouble with that – perhaps I’m too old to cope with such fangled gadgetry!
But that is balanced out by the pleasant surprise that the camera allows exposure compensation in manual mode – up to now a luxury presented to nearly all Nikon users, but only 1DX and 1DX Mk2 Canon owners (to my knowledge anyway) – nice one Canon, it’s about time!
Become a patron from as little as $1 per month, and help me produce more free content. Patrons gain access to a variety of FREE rewards, discounts and bonuses. |
As always the information is very useful since it is based on actual field use backed up by years of analytical experience. Will follow further findings as I am planning to buy this if it passes your overall assessment.
Thanks for your efforts