The new Nikon D4S announced today
Well, that’s about right, my sexy Nikon D4 is officially out of date, and thanks to the Nikon D4S I’ve just lost a grand off the resale value of my camera – cheers chaps…..
Is Uncle Andy stressed at all about being kitted out with yesterdays gear?
Nope, not really.
So what’s new on the Nikon D4S ?
- Well there’s been a few ergonomic tweaks which basically mean nothing for starters.
- Seemingly dispelled are the rumours that it would have a higher Mp count – apparently this stays the same at 16.2Mp.
- I was expecting some major change in AF but no, they’ve kept the venerable Multi-Cam 3500FX system.
- New sensor design.
- BUT – they’ve changed the image processor to Expeed 4 from Expeed 3.
- AND – they’ve changed the battery from EN-EL18 to an EN-EL18a.
Bare in mind all I’m going on is the web – perish the thought that Nikon would ever think my opinion worthy of note and ACTUALLY SEND ME ONE.
Other changes:
- A new Group Area AF mode – which from my own photography PoV is fairly meaningless, seeing as we already have 9 point dynamic AF – I can’t see it’ll make much difference. Plus, the Group AF mode always focusses on the nearest point – something you rarely want the camera to do!
- 6 possible white balance presets as opposed to 3 on the D4 – I jam all my cameras into Cloudy B1 custom WB and leave them there – so this improvement isn’t worth jumping up and down about either.
- Fairly gimmicky S Raw
- Spot White Balance
On the storage front most reports say that the D4S carries over the D4 crazy arrangement of 1x CF plus 1x XQD.
My Basic Thoughts:
New Sensor – well the benefits can’t been seen by yours truly until I see a few RAW files from it – preferably taken by myself.
I’m glad they’ve kept it to 16.2Mp – if you crunch the numbers this is the optimum Mp count for an FX sensor – as Canon worked out aeons ago with the 1DsMk2; but then joined the stupid Mp race.
Image Processor changes – well, it’s reportedly 30% faster than the Expeed 3, which basically means that the D4S fires off images to storage 30% faster.
Now I can go out with the D4 and shoot getting on for 100 uncompressed 14bit RAW files in one continuous burst at 8 or 9 fps – do I want to chew through my storage any faster? NO!
The Expeed 4 gives better high ISO performance?
Well perhaps it does, but I look at it this way. If light is so damn low that you need to shoot at crackpot ISO numbers then you can say one thing – the light is crap.
If the light is crap then the image will look like crap – it’s just that with the Expeed 4 it’ll be slightly less noisy crap.
If I can pull 1/8000th sec at f7 or f8 at 3200ISO in half descent looking light using a D4 – which I do regularly – then why do I need a higher ISO capability?
The Red Squidger images you’ve seen in the previous blog articles are all 2000ISO and there is ZERO noise degradation – so again, why do I need more ISO capability.
Now if I was a ‘jobbing’ photo-jounalist, or I was embedded with the troops in Afghanistan or something of that ilk then I’d perhaps have a much different attitude.
But I’m not, and from my own perspective of wildlife & natural history photography these changes are of little interest to me – especially when they have a £5k price tag.
Battery Changes
There was always a persistent gripe about the battery life of the D4 EN-EL18 power cell – well, I’ve got two of them and have had no problems AT ALL with batteries running low.
I was REALLY annoyed that they switched from EN-EL4A D2/D3 style batteries – I’d got a handful of those already, and now when I go to Norway in June I’ve got to take 2 bloody chargers with me: yes the venerable D3 will be getting a summer holiday this year as second camera.
So, for me at least, the increased battery life of the new Nikon D4S 18a batteries is somewhat inconsequential – why do I want a battery that lasts longer than ‘for ever’ ??
Other Changes/Additions
I can’t see anything that excites me: spot white balance? Go and buy a Colour Checker Passport and do the job right – and that doesn’t cost £5k either (though they are a bit pricey).
Group Area AF – do me a favour (see above).
6 White Balance presets – what’s the point?
All of the above could be given away by Nikon as a firmware update for the D4 if they fancied being generous!
What I Would Have Got Excited About.
Twin UDMA 7 CF card slots and an XQD slot for dedicated video recording.
An improved AF module.
The ability to select ‘matched pairs’ of sensors – Canon offered this years ago and it was brilliant.
Internally recorded FX video of EXACTLY the same quality as that of a Canon 5D3, or at least the same quality as internal 1080p CROP.
AF mode selector back WHERE IT SHOULD BE!
Me being put in charge at Nikon!
In Conclusion
Do I want to buy one (even if I had the dough) – NO!
Do I wish I could afford one – NO!
Would I swap my D4 for a D4s – well of course I would.
Seriously though, I can just see an awful lot of people getting “hot under the collar” and stressing over this latest incarnation of this pro body from Nikon; but seriously, if you are then you need to just take a quiet step back and think about things calmly.
There is nothing – IMHO of course – on the D4S that warrants upgrading from the D4 – unless you have a penchant for spending your money that is.
But if you are still on a D3 or something older, and were thinking about buying a D4 – then hold off a while until the D4S in available; it’s makes better fiscal sense.
Become a patron from as little as $1 per month, and help me produce more free content. Patrons gain access to a variety of FREE rewards, discounts and bonuses. |
Thanks Andy! This is the “executive summary” to read first before diving into all the reviews! 🙂
Well said Andy. I changed from canon to Nikon last June because canon change cameras too quick for my liking. Bought a D600 in June 2013 and it was replaced by the D610 before the year was out. Even Canon were never that quick!
Les
Andy
I had a good look at a D4S and in summary would agree with you. Does it make sense to upgrade from a D4 – no. Not enough to warrant the loss in selling the D4 and buying the latest and greatest. If you are looking to go from a D3 model then yes, the D4S makes sense.
The extra light sensitivity – I shoot a lot of low light. Where the subject is static long exposure rather than high ISO, works very well. Where the subject is moving then regularly ISO6400 to produce not perfect but useable (= saleable) results. Beyond that a lot of post is required to deal with noise. The D4S on the limited look I had did not seem to offer much better quality at ISO6400.
The body will get rave reviews I expect – it has moved the low light goal post for Canon just as they were trying to get to the performance of the D4. But the cold hard truth is there is not enough in the new body to persuade many of the current D4 users to go out and buy one.